1968 Citroen Ami vs. 2006 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2006 Volvo XC70 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo XC70 (207 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ami. (29 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 1115 kg more than 1968 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Volvo XC70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Ami | 2006 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Ami | XC70 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 70 L |