1968 Citroen Ami vs. 2008 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2008 Volvo XC90 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volvo XC90 (207 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ami. (29 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1578 kg more than 1968 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Ami | 2008 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Ami | XC90 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 2198 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 70 L |