1968 Citroen Ami vs. 2010 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2010 Toyota Corolla is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Corolla is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Corolla (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ami. (29 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Corolla should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Corolla weights approximately 685 kg more than 1968 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Ami | 2010 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | Ami | Corolla |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4539 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1466 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 50 L |