1968 Citroen Ami vs. 2010 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2010 Toyota Highlander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,700 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Highlander (187 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ami. (29 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 1124 kg more than 1968 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Ami | 2010 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | Ami | Highlander |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4785 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 73 L |