1968 Citroen Ami vs. 2011 Mazda 6
To start off, 2011 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 6 (153 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ami. (29 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 6 weights approximately 815 kg more than 1968 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Ami | 2011 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Ami | 6 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 70 L |