1968 Citroen Ami vs. 2011 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2011 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Sequoia (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 352 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ami. (29 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 2095 kg more than 1968 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Ami | 2011 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | Ami | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 381 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 2715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1956 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3099 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 100 L |