1968 Citroen Ami vs. 2012 Ford F-350
To start off, 2012 Ford F-350 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-350 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 356 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ami. (29 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ami.
Because 2012 Ford F-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford F-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen Ami | 2012 Ford F-350 | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | Ami | F-350 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 29 HP | 385 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 6269 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1961 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3967 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 132 L |
