1968 Citroen Ami vs. 2013 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Ami. (29 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 1307 kg more than 1968 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Ami | 2013 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Ami | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1927 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 76 L |