1968 Citroen DS vs. 2002 MCC Smart
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Citroen DS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Citroen DS (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2002 MCC Smart. (80 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Citroen DS should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Citroen DS weights approximately 660 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen DS | 2002 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Citroen | MCC |
| Model | DS | Smart |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2174 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 80 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 35 L |
