1968 Citroen DS vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1968 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo S60 weights approximately 171 kg more than 1968 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Citroen DS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen DS | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | DS | S60 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 295 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 68 L |
