1968 Citroen DS vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Citroen DS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1968 Citroen DS. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen DS.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Citroen DS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen DS | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | DS | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2174 cc | 1786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 45 L |
