1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 1040 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 1946 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Dyane 6 | PV 60 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1946 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2850 mm |