1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 1964 NSU Wankel Spider
To start off, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 NSU Wankel Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 NSU Wankel Spider would be higher. At 602 cc (2 cylinders), 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 NSU Wankel Spider weights approximately 145 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 1964 NSU Wankel Spider is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 NSU Wankel Spider. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 1964 NSU Wankel Spider | |
| Make | Citroen | NSU |
| Model | Dyane 6 | Wankel Spider |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 497 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 49 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 735 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2020 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 34 L |
