1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 746 cc (2 cylinders), 1966 DAF Daffodil is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DAF Daffodil weights approximately 76 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Citroen | DAF |
| Model | Dyane 6 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 26 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 33 L |
