1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 1974 Triumph Toledo
To start off, 1974 Triumph Toledo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Triumph Toledo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Triumph Toledo weights approximately 298 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 1974 Triumph Toledo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Triumph Toledo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 1974 Triumph Toledo | |
Make | Citroen | Triumph |
Model | Dyane 6 | Toledo |
Year Released | 1968 | 1974 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 57 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 888 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 63 L |