1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 1976 Volvo 265
To start off, 1976 Volvo 265 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Volvo 265 weights approximately 810 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 1976 Volvo 265 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 265. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 1976 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Dyane 6 | 265 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2660 mm |