1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 1978 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 1978 Datsun 280Z is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Datsun 280Z is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Datsun 280Z weights approximately 714 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 1978 Datsun 280Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Datsun 280Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 1978 Datsun 280Z | |
| Make | Citroen | Datsun |
| Model | Dyane 6 | 280Z |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1978 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 2753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1304 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4399 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1631 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2304 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 60 L |
