1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 1983 Lotus Excel
To start off, 1983 Lotus Excel is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Lotus Excel is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Lotus Excel weights approximately 545 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 1983 Lotus Excel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Lotus Excel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 1983 Lotus Excel | |
Make | Citroen | Lotus |
Model | Dyane 6 | Excel |
Year Released | 1968 | 1983 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2174 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 31 L |