1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 1984 Volvo 240
To start off, 1984 Volvo 240 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Volvo 240 weights approximately 700 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 1984 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 1984 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Dyane 6 | 240 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2660 mm |