1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 2002 BMW Z3
To start off, 2002 BMW Z3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW Z3 weights approximately 855 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 2002 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 2002 BMW Z3 | |
Make | Citroen | BMW |
Model | Dyane 6 | Z3 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 229 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 51 L |