1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 2004 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2004 Ford Expedition is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 4,603 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1777 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 2004 Ford Expedition is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Expedition. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 2004 Ford Expedition | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Dyane 6 | Expedition |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 4603 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 232 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 2367 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 106 L |