1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 2004 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XJ is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 4,193 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1099 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 2004 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 2004 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | Dyane 6 | XJ |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 4193 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 400 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1689 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 85 L |