1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1852 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Citroen | Land Rover |
| Model | Dyane 6 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 2442 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 100 L |
