1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 2004 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 802 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 2004 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 2004 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Dyane 6 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 189 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1392 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 61 L |