1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 1,493 cc (3 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 450 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 2004 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
Model | Dyane 6 | Colt |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 47 L |