1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 2009 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2009 Ford Taurus is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Taurus weights approximately 517 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 2009 Ford Taurus is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Taurus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 2009 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | Dyane 6 | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 263 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1107 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 76 L |
