1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 2010 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Charger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1126 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 2010 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 2010 Dodge Charger | |
| Make | Citroen | Dodge |
| Model | Dyane 6 | Charger |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 250 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1716 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5083 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1478 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3048 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 68 L |
