1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1331 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 2011 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | Dyane 6 | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1921 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1712 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2748 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 70 L |
