1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 2000 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| Make | Citroen | Land Rover |
| Model | Dyane 6 | Range Rover Sport |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 510 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 2590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4783 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1933 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1788 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2743 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 88 L |
