1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 2012 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2012 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 2160 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 2012 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 2012 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | Dyane 6 | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 381 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 2750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1956 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3099 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 100 L |
