1968 Citroen Dyane 6 vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Z weights approximately 983 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 2013 Nissan Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Nissan Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | 2013 Nissan Z | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | Dyane 6 | Z |
Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 327 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1573 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4246 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1326 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 72 L |