1968 Citroen Dyane vs. 1951 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1968 Citroen Dyane is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Ford Taunus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Ford Taunus (34 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Dyane. (24 HP @ 6750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Ford Taunus should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Dyane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Ford Taunus weights approximately 240 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Dyane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen Dyane | 1951 Ford Taunus | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | Dyane | Taunus |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2390 mm |
