1968 Citroen Dyane vs. 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1528 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane.
Because 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Dyane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Citroen Dyane | 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Citroen | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Dyane | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 1968 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 2118 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 107 L |