1968 Citroen Dyane vs. 1992 Holden Nova
To start off, 1992 Holden Nova is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane would be higher. At 1,397 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Nova (81 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Dyane. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Dyane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Nova weights approximately 425 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Nova (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Citroen Dyane. (29 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Citroen Dyane.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen Dyane | 1992 Holden Nova | |
| Make | Citroen | Holden |
| Model | Dyane | Nova |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 1397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 81 HP |
| Torque | 29 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2440 mm |
