1968 Citroen Dyane vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen Dyane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen Dyane would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1968 Citroen Dyane. (24 HP @ 6750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen Dyane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1330 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Citroen Dyane. (29 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Citroen Dyane.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Citroen Dyane | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | Dyane | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 29 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 87 L |
