1968 DAF 44 vs. 2000 Acura EL
To start off, 2000 Acura EL is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DAF 44 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura EL (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1968 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1968 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura EL weights approximately 324 kg more than 1968 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura EL (145 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 DAF 44. (65 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2000 Acura EL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 DAF 44 | 2000 Acura EL | |
| Make | DAF | Acura |
| Model | 44 | EL |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 844 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 65 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 755 kg | 1079 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4478 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1704 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2619 mm |
