1968 DAF 44 vs. 2000 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DAF 44 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mazda 626 (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1968 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1968 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda 626 weights approximately 390 kg more than 1968 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mazda 626 (152 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 DAF 44. (65 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2000 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
1968 DAF 44 | 2000 Mazda 626 | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 44 | 626 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 844 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 65 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 755 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2620 mm |