1968 DAF 44 vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DAF 44 would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo C70 (206 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1968 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1968 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo C70 weights approximately 810 kg more than 1968 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo C70 (285 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 DAF 44. (65 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 DAF 44 | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | DAF | Volvo |
| Model | 44 | C70 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 844 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 206 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 65 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 755 kg | 1565 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2650 mm |
