1968 DAF 44 vs. 2004 Mazda 2
To start off, 2004 Mazda 2 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DAF 44 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 2 (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1968 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1968 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 400 kg more than 1968 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 2 (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 DAF 44. (65 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 DAF 44 | 2004 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | 44 | 2 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 844 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 65 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 755 kg | 1155 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2620 mm |
