1968 DAF 44 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DAF 44 would be higher. At 2,487 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1968 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1968 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 795 kg more than 1968 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 DAF 44. (65 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
1968 DAF 44 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 44 | 6 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 844 cc | 2487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 65 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 755 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2800 mm |