1968 DAF 44 vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DAF 44 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1968 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1968 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 3 weights approximately 545 kg more than 1968 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 DAF 44. (65 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
1968 DAF 44 | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 44 | 3 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 844 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 65 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 755 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2639 mm |