1968 DAF 44 vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DAF 44 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1968 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1968 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 1211 kg more than 1968 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 DAF 44. (65 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
1968 DAF 44 | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 44 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 844 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 65 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 755 kg | 1966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2875 mm |