1968 DAF 44 vs. 2010 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Toyota Tundra is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DAF 44 would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Tundra (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 347 more horse power than 1968 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1968 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 577 kg more than 1968 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 479 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 DAF 44. (65 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 DAF 44 | 2010 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | DAF | Toyota |
| Model | 44 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 844 cc | 5663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 381 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 65 Nm | 544 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 755 kg | 1332 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3710 mm |
