1968 DAF 44 vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DAF 44 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1968 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1968 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Clio weights approximately 463 kg more than 1968 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Clio (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 DAF 44. (65 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
1968 DAF 44 | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | DAF | Renault |
Model | 44 | Clio |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 844 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 65 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 755 kg | 1218 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2580 mm |