1968 De Tomaso Mangusta vs. 1960 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta (301 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 1960 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta should accelerate faster than 1960 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta weights approximately 790 kg more than 1960 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta | 1960 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | De Tomaso | Triumph |
| Model | Mangusta | Herald |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1960 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4727 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 29 L |
