1968 De Tomaso Mangusta vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta (301 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Because 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 De Tomaso Mangusta | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | De Tomaso | Renault |
Model | Mangusta | Clio |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4727 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 50 L |