1968 DKW Munga vs. 1954 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1968 DKW Munga is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Jeep CJ (136 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1968 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ should accelerate faster than 1968 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Jeep CJ weights approximately 70 kg more than 1968 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 DKW Munga | 1954 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | DKW | Jeep |
| Model | Munga | CJ |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3687 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 136 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2060 mm |
