1968 DKW Munga vs. 2000 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2000 Ford Taurus is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,933 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Taurus (156 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1968 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1968 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Taurus weights approximately 411 kg more than 1968 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Taurus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 DKW Munga | 2000 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2933 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3950 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1521 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 68 L |
