1968 DKW Munga vs. 2000 Volvo C70
To start off, 2000 Volvo C70 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,984 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo C70 (161 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1968 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1968 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo C70 weights approximately 294 kg more than 1968 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Volvo C70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 DKW Munga | 2000 Volvo C70 | |
Make | DKW | Volvo |
Model | Munga | C70 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1404 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 68 L |