1968 DKW Munga vs. 2001 Ford TE-50
To start off, 2001 Ford TE-50 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford TE-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford TE-50 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1968 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford TE-50 should accelerate faster than 1968 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford TE-50 weights approximately 556 kg more than 1968 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford TE-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 DKW Munga | 2001 Ford TE-50 | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | TE-50 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 4940 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 68 L |